|
The
Title
While the piece itself is
haunting and beautiful, its effect has surely been enhanced
by its mysterious title. Couperin gave most of his
harpsichord pieces titles. This practice stemmed from "the
music of Chambonnières and the earliest works of the French
'clavecinists' who, in turn, had borrowed the habit from the
lutenists of the late sixteenth century" (David Tunley,
Couperin, BBC, 1982, p. 79). Some of Couperin's pieces
are named after people or types of people, some indicate
something the music is supposed to represent. A few of the
names, however, remain mysteries to us. David Tunley adds
that "even in their own days these same pieces might well
have appeared enigmatic to all but a handful of the
composers' circle" (ibid., p. 82-3). Such appears to
be the case with "Les Barricades Mistérieuses." However,
this has not stopped people from speculating.
In 'The mirror of human
life': Reflections on François Couperin's Pièces de
Clavecin by Jane Clark and Derek Connon (Redcroft, King's
Music, 2002), Jane Clark links the VIth ordre to a
divertissement staged by one of Couperin's patrons, the
Duchesse Du Maine in 1714. The entertainment was called
Le Mystère ou les Fêtes de l'Inconnu (The Mysterious One
or the Celebrations of the Unknown One). In the performance,
the King's musicians and Marguerite-Louise Couperin
(François' sister) wore masks, emphasizing the mysterious
presence celebrated by the divertissement, possibly
the exiled Stuart James III. Clark suggests that the
barricades mistérieuses may refer to these masks (p.
67-8). With regard to another piece, La Misterieuse,
in the XXVth ordre, Clark suggests a possible
reference to the Duchesse Du Maine's interests in
freemasonry.
Wilfrid Mellers also wonders
if there is a link to a divertissement. He suggests
that the piece is "one of Couperin's technical jokes, the
continuous suspensions in the lute style being a barricade
to the basic harmony; and this may link up with the illusory
devices in a masque decor. Barricades has its modern
sense after 1648, but if the harmonic ambiguities might be
described as 'revolutionary' in the context of baroque
orthodoxies, the tone of the music remains, even in its
mystery, impeccably aristocratic" (François Couperin and
the French Classical Tradition, new version, London,
Faber and Faber, 1987, pp. 400-2). However, none of
Couperin's other names with which I am familiar refer to
technical aspects of the music itself other than to name its
form or type. So on Meller's hypothesis, this title would be
quite an anomaly. And why should the 'barricades' to the
basic harmony be described as 'mysterious'?
[To be expanded] |