|
|
Pacing the Work
|
|
DATE |
Assignment Due this class |
Class work/activity |
|
wk 1, day 1 |
|
Survey of writing. Discussion of class, introductions, explanation of syllabus. |
|
wk 1, day 2 |
Assignment 1: Response to Introduction; |
authorial notes written in class; discussion of introduction to review project of the course and expectations; survey of sequence with overview of schedule; discussion of survey results to set up Frisch |
|
wk 2, day 1 |
Read Chapter 5 Part II on Surveys using SQRMR method |
discussion of chapter and comparison of marking the text; close consideration of student sample; what revisions would be necessary to pursue the survey of writing as a real inquiry? class activity moving from research question to survey |
|
wk 2, day 2 |
Read Frisch focusing on the steps of his methods |
Discussion of Frisch in relation to assignment – how could you do similar work? what were the steps in Frisch’s process? ( or adapt example of Teaching Reading -- following the steps of a inquiry) |
|
wk 3, day 1 |
first draft of survey and research question |
initial pilot of survey in class groups. discussion of relationship between research question and survey questions. return to Frisch and Rosina examples for movement between data and argument |
|
wk 3, day 2 |
small scale pilot (10-12 people) with data table; Read Working on Writing with Numbers |
what do your results indicate about your survey? how do you interpret the results? what tentative interpretations can be made? return to Frisch and student model for discussion of how to present the information; complete survey checklist |
|
wk 4, day 1 |
survey done (usually 50-75 participants), data compiled, tentative argument or interpretation drafted; at least one graphic drafted |
work with data and argument; discussion of evaluation criteria for this assignment |
|
wk 4, day 2 |
Assignment 2: Frisch assignment due; authorial notes to be done in advance |
proof reading – using chart in Chapter 2; peer review exchange with a partner using version of questions in Chapter 2 |
|
wk 5, day 1 |
Read Thelen using Advanced Organizer |
discussion of Thelen noting how interviews are used as data and difference in presentation; discussion of generated lists – who will you interview and what are you wanting to know? |
|
wk 5, day 2 |
Read Chapter 4 on Interviews and develop both the theoretical and conversational questions; note transcription marks in figure 6.1 |
show excerpt of Watergate video and have students practice note taking from oral speech; or work OR work from Practice Activity 6.5. Critique questions in small groups, then practice the interviewing with a partner. |
|
wk 6, day 1 |
interview transcripts due in class |
do activity 4.6 as class; discuss. Turn to students’ interview transcripts and discuss in groups. |
|
wk 6, day 2 |
Reread Chapter 2 on analysis and working with quotations, Read Chapter 4 on Writing from Interviews and Sample student essays |
Discussion of student essays and evaluation criteria for this assignment; peer work on drafts |
|
wk 7, day 1 |
Assignment 3: Thelen assignment due with authorial notes done in advance |
set up archival work with presentation by librarian or using Practice Activity 6.7 |
|
wk 7, day 2 |
Read Jackson noting different kinds of evidence |
discussion of reading in relation to assignment – what archives are available and interesting? what research questions would you pursue with these materials? who would be your audience? |
|
wk 8, day 1 |
initial archival material to class |
analysis – what does the data tell us? |
|
wk 8, day 2 |
|
working on writing and analysis |
|
wk 9, day 1 |
|
working on writing and analysis |
|
wk 9, day 2 |
Assignment 4: Jackson assignment, authorial notes done in advance |
set up work with visuals using practice activities in chapter 3 |
|
wk 10, day 1 |
Read Edwards and Winkler with attention to theoretical lens |
discussion of Edwards and Winkler in relation to assignment – how will you do similar work? how do you test their theory? |
|
wk 10, day 2 |
Read Chapter 3 section on visuals; bring initial collection of cartoons (at least 5 examples) |
discussion – what would you say about these visuals? how would you support or continue this work? use editorial cartoon checklist in groups |
|
wk 11, day 1 |
draft of introductory frame that includes a summary/restatement of Edwards and Winkler’s work |
rereading Edwards and Winkler to follow their use of a theoretical lens (adapt reading as a researcher lesson or use understanding the writer's move focused rereading) peer critique of the introductory frame/summary |
|
wk 11, day 2 |
Assignment 5: Edwards and Winkler assignment due; authorial notes done in advance |
set up textual work with library visit/presentation; have students practice with various data bases to consider how they might pursue a revision of earlier assignments that adds secondary source material? |
|
wk 12, day 1 |
Read White noting different kinds of evidence and analysis; Read Chapter 6 on Textual Analysis |
discuss White in relation to assignment. What topics or questions might you pursue? or, how might you add textual analysis to an earlier assignment? see student writer Sanderson in chapter 6. |
|
wk 12, day 2 |
draft of revision for peer review |
use facets of a critical reading to generate a list of points that might be made about your textual data. discuss analysis in relation to how you have use this material in a revision; work with drafts in relation to evaluation criteria |
|
wk 13, day 1 |
Assignment 6: revision adding textual analysis or assignment based on White |
discussion of final portfolio submissions |
|
wk 13, day 2 |
reread eye toward revision in chapter 2; reread all essays and authorial notes |
working on writing issues; analyzing your own work |
|
wk 14, day 1 |
tentative portfolio essay due |
peer review on portfolio essay |
|
wk 14, day 2 |
Final Portfolio due |
course evaluations, celebrations of final written products |
Send mail to
mmarshall@miami.edu with
questions or comments about this web site.
|